Herbicide vs excavation: which is right?
The two main ways to deal with Japanese knotweed. Herbicide is cheaper and less disruptive but takes 2–3 years. Excavation removes the rhizome in days but costs far more and tears up the ground. Herbicide suits gardens with no deadline; excavation suits development sites and urgent sales. Both can carry an insurance-backed guarantee.
The two methods at a glance
Almost every professional knotweed job comes down to one of these two approaches — or a blend of both. Here's how they compare on the things that matter.
Professional glyphosate applied over several growing seasons.
Physically removing the rhizome and contaminated soil.
Which should you choose?
It comes down to three questions: how fast do you need it gone, what's your budget, and how close is it to a building?
Not either/or: the combined approach
Many sites are best served by combining the two — partial excavation to remove the bulk of the rhizome quickly, followed by a herbicide programme on any regrowth. It's faster than spraying alone and cheaper than a full dig-out, and it still carries an insurance-backed guarantee. A survey will tell you whether it's the right fit.